Back to Maus

Maccy alternative with more features (Maus vs Maccy)

May 4, 2026 · Manuel Toledo

Maccy is a great clipboard manager. If you've landed here it's probably because you already use it and something is missing, or you're choosing between the two.

I built Maus, so this is biased. But I've used Maccy for years too, and I'm going to be honest about when Maccy is the better choice.

When to stick with Maccy

Maccy is the right answer if:

  1. Open source matters above all. Maus isn't open source. Maccy is — it's on GitHub, you can audit it, fork it, contribute.
  2. You want the lightest possible thing. Maccy is ridiculously lightweight. Maus is too, but Maccy wins on RAM footprint by a few MB.
  3. You don't need more than basic clipboard history + pin. Maccy does that very well and doesn't need to do more.
  4. You prefer a dropdown from the menubar. Some people find that mental model cleaner. Maccy is for you.

When Maus is the better choice

Maus makes sense if:

  1. You want the window to open where your cursor is, not up in the menubar. This is the biggest UX shift between the two. Once you try it, the menubar dropdown feels like an extra trip every time you copy something.
  2. You need sequential multipaste. ⌘+Click several items, Enter, they paste in order. Maccy doesn't do this.
  3. You need autopaste. Maus has a "listening" mode: double-tap , copy several things in a row, the next ⌘V pastes them all in order. Useful for filling forms, moving data between sheets, lists. Maccy doesn't have it.
  4. You copy screenshots with text. Maus runs OCR automatically and stores the text alongside the image — searchable and copyable. Maccy doesn't.
  5. You work with long lists or CSVs. Maus has split: copy a list, divide it into individual clips with a click. Paste one by one. Maccy doesn't.
  6. You want themes beyond light/dark. Maus Pro includes Dracula and Solarized.

The philosophy: the "anti-clipboard manager", clipboard manager

My commitment to anyone using Maus is simple: every day you should be able to be a little more productive. Your time is for impact, and moving information around with copy-paste isn't impact. That's why Maus wants to disappear — open quickly when you need it, then get out of the way again. If it goes from being a tool to being an invisible assistant, it's doing its job.

Maccy shares that philosophy up to a point: both are lightweight, don't bother you, don't ask for an account. The difference is in scope. Maccy stays intentionally in the basics — that's a legitimate choice. Maus goes further with autopaste, OCR, split, multipaste. More features can sound like feature creep, but every one of these is functional (not decorative) and stays optional.

Use cases where Maus shines in 2026

"An unexpected productivity hack." — r/macapps user

Direct comparison

MaccyMaus
PriceFree (open source)Free · Pro $12.99 once
Open sourceYes ✓No
Window positionMenubar dropdownAt your cursor
SearchYesYes
PinYesYes
Sequential multipasteNoYes
AutopasteNoYes (double-tap ⌘)
Screenshot OCRNoYes
List splitNoYes
Color captureNoYes
File captureLimitedYes
Custom themesNoYes (Pro)
Apple Silicon nativeYesYes
Privacy100% local100% local

Try both side by side

If you're undecided, install Maus alongside Maccy for a couple of days. Maus is free with every feature (24h history). If it doesn't add anything over Maccy for you, uninstall it. If you stick with Maus, you can uninstall Maccy or keep both — they don't fight each other.

Try Maus, free

Every feature included. 24 hours of history. No account, no trial.

Download for Mac Maccy on GitHub